Communicating the path to net zero using visual metaphor
Offshore infrastructure firm Heerema took an unconventional approach to communicating its net-zero ambition to win buy-in from employees and stakeholders. ...
by Jan van der Kaaij, Benoit F. Leleux Published 7 October 2024 in Sustainability ⢠6 min read
By 2029 at the latest, an estimated 50,000 companies will have to comply with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). It comes as no surprise then that corporates around the globe are working hard to comply with the rapidly emerging regulatory frameworks on sustainability reporting.
A big chunk of these sustainability efforts is connected to the double materiality assessment, a key foundation for non-financial reporting and ESG risk profiling that includes not only a companyâs financial materiality (sustainability issues that might impact a companyâs results) but also its impact materiality (its business activities that might have an impact on society).
But should double materiality assessment solely serve as an exercise in checking boxes on a compliant sustainability report? Perhaps we could capture more potential value from this comprehensive analysis of sustainability issues that impact stakeholders. But to what avail? Is the assessment singularly applicable to non-financial reporting or can it be used beyond the realm of the CFO? How can the full value potential of this broad analysis of sustainability issues that impact stakeholders be captured?
A lot more can be done than just checking boxes on a compliance sustainability report. Companies that exclusively use double materiality assessments for ESG reporting purposes are considered to have fallen into the âReporting Trapâ: They spend sizable amounts of resources on ESG reporting but make little progress on the required transformation towards sustainability.
These companies struggle to turn material issues into a clear and actionable sustainability roadmap. They fail to outline the necessary changes, track progress, and implement mitigation measures effectively.
As field experience with double materiality assessments develops, the recommended list of dos and donâts becomes clearer. This article proposes three best practices that illustrate what companies can do to get more mileage from their double materiality assessments:
Consider the case of one of the oldest and most innovative producers of quality espresso machines in the market, La Marzocco, an Italian company grown from an artisanal builder of high-end professional coffee machines to a global player selling over 40,000 espresso machines per year to professionals and consumers.
To move beyond simple reporting, forward-thinking companies are designing double materiality assessments that focus on taking action. Consider the case of one of the oldest and most innovative producers of quality espresso machines in the market, La Marzocco, an Italian company grown from an artisanal builder of high-end professional coffee machines to a global player selling over 40,000 espresso machines per year to professionals and consumers.
Over the years, its brand has become synonymous with quality and reliability worldwide. Even illycaffè SpA, the espresso coffee specialist, uses La Marzocco machines in its quality control labs because of their unrivaled temperature and pressure stability. Since its inception in 1927 by the Bambi brothers, La Marzocco focused on exceptional craftmanship, user-centric designs, and technology innovation in search of the perfect espresso machine.
While planning its double materiality assessment in 2023, the Florence-based manufacturer focused on how to put the outcomes into action. The results from the assessment were put in the usual three categories (environmental, social, and governance) but La Marzocco went two steps further. First, it described potential materiality issues in detail in the research phase to clarify impact and potential actions (e.g., what could âcircular economyâ mean for La Marzocco?). Second, it labeled the material issues in an alternative way to envision how to act:
1. Transformative priorities
Material topics are essential to build long-term value and maintain a competitive advantage.
2. Sustainability enablers
Material topics that put the company in the right position to address the core focus areas.
3. Continuous improvement areas
Material topics that should be actively monitored and managed to meet compliance standards and mitigate risk.
By reframing the topics, La Marzocco was able to improve the strategic interpretation of the assessment results and better compare them to its existing business strategy and company culture. More importantly, the upgraded categorization of sustainability topics inevitably gives the issues greater weight and priority leading to more robust preparation for action planning.
As businesses develop, their materiality issues change. While broad topics such as climate change may not show obvious changes, practical sustainability concerns can shift, requiring updates to implementation plans, materiality assessments, strategies, and reporting.
If ignored, companies are more likely to become targets for greenwashing allegations since outdated materiality assessments no longer reflect the companyâs true sustainability risks. Typical drivers of significant changes include mergers and acquisitions, substantial changes in business strategy, or emerging issues such as water resilience and biodiversity.
In the first half of 2023, Royal DSM N.V. a purpose-led, science-based company specializing in health and nutrition, merged with Firmenich S.A., the worldâs largest privately-owned fragrance and flavor company. At the time, both companies had an excellent reputation in sustainability and led their industries in ESG benchmark performance.
Even though both DSM and Firmenich were equipped with recent materiality assessments (no older than 12 months), they decided to conduct a new double materiality assessment for all four DSM-Firmenich divisions individually and combine them into one new corporate version. The assessment process not only created a new corporate materiality matrix but also helped align the sustainability roadmaps and organizations.
Similarly, La Marzocco encountered its fair share of sustainability dynamics. At the end of 2023, DeâLonghi SpA became the major shareholder of La Marzocco and announced the formation of a global hub in the professional coffee machine market to drive synergies. The hub included not only La Marzocco but also Eversys, a Swiss manufacturer of premium professional espresso machines also owned by DeâLonghi SpA. This change impacted the groupâs sustainability roadmap and led to new questions such as, âHow would the material issues at Eversys differ from those at La Marzocco?â and âHow to deal with ESG reporting requirements from the DeâLonghi Group?â
Aside from a major event like the new ownership and group structure, La Marzoccoâs sustainability team tries to stay up to date with its materiality results by capturing the impact of smaller events and even micro-trends. It developed a simple card sorting tool to track market perceptions and prioritize sustainability topics. Each card contains a potentially material issue, and stakeholders are requested to sort the cards in order of relevance. Later stakeholders are interviewed about why they made certain choices. This low-tech tool is used at events and meetings to spark discussion with internal and external stakeholders like coffee roasters, farmers, and corporate clients. This allows the sustainability team to continuously collect and monitor feedback from a diverse group of stakeholders.
With the war on âwoke ESGâ expected to intensify in the US as the presidential elections draw nearer, the number of victims of the Reporting Trap is likely to grow. Certain companies are already altering their language around ESG and net zero commitments, engaging in what the Financial Times refers to as âgreen hushingâ, a term used when companies are downplaying their sustainability performance, for fear of being labeled greenwashers.
On the contrary, transformative companies such as DSM-Firmenich and La Marzocco continue to communicate their sustainability program in detail without overstating progress or understating the gaps. Transformation is virtually impossible when remaining silent, so it is critical to walk the talk and talk the walk while exchanging with stakeholders on a continuous basis.
This is the first in a series of three articles on how to better deliver winning sustainability strategies. The next article will explore the use of business design thinking to develop sustainability roadmaps, such as how to decarbonize your business. The last article will discuss improving engagement from external value chain partners as performance on transformative topics is often co-dependent on other actors within the value chain.
14 October 2024 ⢠by Heather Cairns-Lee, Ramon de Haas , Meike Kolthof in Sustainability
Offshore infrastructure firm Heerema took an unconventional approach to communicating its net-zero ambition to win buy-in from employees and stakeholders. ...
30 September 2024 ⢠by StÊphane J. G. Girod in Sustainability
Smarter regulation is required to nudge luxury brands into a more sustainable future, industry experts tell StĂŠphane Girod....
30 September 2024 ⢠by Luca Allaria in Sustainability
Through coaching, Jack, a senior executive, discovers how to achieve sustainable leadership by striking a balance between his team's empowerment and his own forceful manner....
27 September 2024 ⢠by Michael Yaziji, David Bach in Sustainability
Could a new approach beyond a companyâs products and services be the key to improving performance on environmental, social, and governance metrics? ...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience